Legal Opinion

Corn Belt Savings Bank v. Kriz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The controverted covenant of the mortgage reads:

“The said mortgagor hereby covenants * * * second to pay all other indebtedness that the mortgagee may hold or acquire against said mortgagor, or either of them, and pay any and all notes and other obligations which the mortgagor, or either of them, may at any time be owing the mortgagee during the existence of this mortgage.”

Emma and Rose Kriz claim the existence of confidential relations between them and plaintiff’s cashier, Sadowsky, who procured execution of the mortgage sued upon, and who also drew or supervised the drawing of the second…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtis v. ArmagastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Dawson v. National Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. First National Bank v. Ten NapelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Turnis v. BallouSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Collins v. NagelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First v. ByrneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. First Bank & Trust Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Burger v. KrallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Sullivan v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Sanborn Savings Bank v. Connie FreedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API