Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Brown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 22, 1916No. 399PublishedCited by 22 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. The facts, which involve the validity of a verdict and judgment for damages under the Employers’ Liability Act, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

Basing his cause of action upon the Federal Employers’ Liability and Safety Appliance Acts, Brown, the defendant in error, sued to recover damages resulting from injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the Railroad Company while he was in its employ and engaged in interstate commerce. At the close of the testimony the claim under the Safety Appliance Act was withdrawn and the case was submitted to the jury alone upon the Employers’ Liability. Act. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff which was affirmed by the court below.

There was a sharp conflict between…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jolly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Templeton v. C. & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  5. Caudle v. SwansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API