Legal Opinion

First Trust & Savings Bank v. Warden

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1936No. Civ. S. C. 41PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant C. P. Warden alone from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage on real property. No reporter’s transcript has been filed, and this appeal is prosecuted upon the judgment roll alone.

The amended and supplemental complaint sets up the relationship of husband and wife existing between appellant and defendant Grace P. Warden; the execution of the note and mortgage by defendant Grace P. Warden on March 12, 1928; certain extension agreements; default of the last-named defendant under the terms of the note and mortgage; that appellant C. P. Warden has or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sukeforth v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Horton v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Weil (In Re Elliott)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Schuler-Knox Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Arighi v. Rule & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BuschWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Vieth v. KlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API