Legal Opinion

City of Oklahoma City v. Iams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1930No. 21449PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma ■county granting a temporary injunction in :an action wherein i>laintiff error was defendant. The defendants in error, plaintiff below, filed their petition in the trial court praying for a permanent injunction against the defendant. They also prayed for a temporary restraining order, which was granted. In the restraining order, “It is further ordered that the application * * * for temporary injunction is hereby set for hearing”* * * on May 30, 1930.”

The record attached to the petition in error is certified by the clerk of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. In Re Guardianship of ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Barfield Petroleum Co. v. Pickering Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Butler v. ArchardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Piersol v. State Ex Rel. County Atty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kalka v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Frates Co. of Tulsa v. PlanckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API