Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, State Ethics Commission v. Baldwin

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1982No. 523 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order by

Judge Blatt,

The State Ethics Commission (Commission) challenges nomination petitions filed by 12 prospective candidates for the offices of state senator and state representative1 on the grounds that affidavits sub*43mitted with those petitions attesting that the candidate had filed financial interest statements with the Commission were false.

A hearing was held in this matter on March 26,1982 at which the following respondents appeared either in person or through their respective attorneys: Respondent Baldwin; Respondent Forbidussi; Respondent Frumer; Respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. In Re Nomination of CianfraniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. In re Nominating Petition of BarlipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, State Ethics Commission v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. In re Nomination Petition of GuzzardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. COM., STATE ETHICS COM'N v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. In Re the Nomination Petition of McMonagleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. In Re Nomination Petition of GranatCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API