Legal Opinion

State v. Weyeneth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1992No. 9107-96559; CA A71096PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Defendant appeals from an involuntary commitment order. ORS 426.307(6). He acknowledges that he has a mental disorder. On de novo review, State v. Pieretti, 110 Or App 379, 381, 823 P2d 426 (1991), rev den 313 Or 354 (1992), we conclude that he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is not receiving care necessary for his health and safety and, for that reason, he is mentally ill. ORS 426.005(2)(b).

Defendant argues that, even assuming that he is mentally ill, the trial court erred by committing him. ORS 426.130 provides, in part:

“ (1) After hearing all of the evidence, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PierettiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. DeSassiveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API