Cascade Auto Co. v. Petter
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintiff in error was defendant, and defendant in error was plaintiff, in the trial court and they are hereinafter so designated.
Defendant operated a garage in Colorado Springs. Plaintiff stored his automobile there, under contract. When ealled for the car had disappeared. It was recovered in a badly damaged condition in an adjoining state. This suit was brought for such damages and the cause was tried to a jury. To review a judgment in the sum of $625.69 entered upon a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error and the cause is now before us on its application for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Denver Union Terminal Railway Co. v. CullinanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Parris v. JaquithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keenan Hotel Co. v. FunkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Boldt v. Motor Securities Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Lee Tire & Rubber Co. of the State of NY v. DormerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Central Meat Market v. Longwell's Transfer, Inc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.