Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bancorp Leasing & Financial Corp. v. Stadeli Pump & Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1986No. 144,821; CA A34773Published

1DissentYoung, J.

I dissent. The essential facts are not disputed. Plaintiff has a security interest in the truck. The engine failed. After the truck sat idle for roughly two years, a replacement engine was installed. Otto owned the replacement engine and he loaned it to his sons, the principals in the debtor corporation, who installed it in the truck. After the debtor defaulted on its loan from plaintiff, the replacement engine was removed from the truck and returned to Otto. The question is whether the replacement engine acceded to the truck. If it did, plaintiff acquired a security interest in the engine,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Zandbergen v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. MacK's Used Cars & Parts, Inc. v. Tennessee Truck & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API