Legal Opinion

Zandbergen v. Burch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 1978No. 32822, CA 9104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*365TANZER, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for conversion of a winch. We take the facts from defendant’s brief. Defendant sold his truck to one Broche. Broche installed an electric winch by attaching it to the frame of the truck underneath the truck bed. The winch could not be seen without looking underneath the truck. Thereafter, Broche instructed his employees to remove the winch from the truck, but they did not do so. Broche, thinking that the winch had been removed, sold the truck back to defendant.

Defendant then sold the truck to plaintiff. Neither of them knew that the winch was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Remington v. LandoltOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacK's Used Cars & Parts, Inc. v. Tennessee Truck & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  2. Bancorp Leasing & Financial Corp. v. Stadeli Pump & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Bancorp Leasing & Financial Corp. v. Stadeli Pump & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Zandbergen v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API