Legal Opinion
Zelazny v. Pilgrim Funding Corp.
Nassau County District Court
Decided December 6, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Gibbons, J.
Plaintiffs move for a summary judgment in this action instituted to recover damages by reason of defendant’s alleged breach of contract to lend money. Plaintiffs claim that on the 30th of April, 1963, they entered into a contract with James M. Clarke and his wife to purchase a one-family house at 41 Larry Drive, Commack, New York. The contract provided that it was subject to the purchasers’ obtaining a commitment for a mortgage loan in the sum of $15,700 for a term of 30 years at an interest rate of 5]/2% per annum. Thereafter an application was made to the defendant, Pilgrim Funding…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Buchanan v. . TildenNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Avalon Construction Corp. v. Kirch Holding Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Dunbar Molasses Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Bouton v. . WelchNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Daniel R. Murphy and Susan Murphy v. Empire of America, FsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Dubin Weston, Inc. v. Louis Capano & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Pipkin v. Thomas & Hill, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Springfield Y Trust v. Executive Director of the Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Murphy v. Empire of America FSADistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.