Legal Opinion

Coufal v. Demertgsis

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 10, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

2Per curiam

Plaintiff sues for commissions alleged to have been earned in procuring a tenant who was given the exclusive right to use part of the wall surface of defendants’ building during a specified period, for the purpose of displaying advertisements thereon. The agreement between the advertiser so procured and the defendants created a real property right in the nature of an easement (Borough Bill Posting Co. v. Levy, 144 App. Div. 784; Rochester Poster Advertising Co., Inc., v. Smith*371ers, 224 App. Div. 435, 436-437), and plaintiff having acted in the transaction as a real estate broker…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rochester Poster Advertising Co. v. SmithersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Borough Bill Posting Co. v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halpern v. SilverCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  2. Coufal v. DemertgsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API