Legal Opinion · Dissent

Village of Maryville v. Illinois Labor Relations Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 2010No. 5-08-0545Published

1DissentJustice Chapman

I dissent from the majority’s opinion.

The majority determines that the Village of Maryville adequately established the supervisory power of its two sergeants, Sergeant Lange and Sergeant Howe, finding fault with the Board for not relying upon the evidence of the quality of the supervisory powers held by the sergeants as opposed to the quantity. In reversing the focus to the quality of the supervisory powers, the majority seizes upon isolated case language to support this theory. See City of Peru v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 167 Ill. App. 3d 284, 521 N.E.2d 108 (1988). The case at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Local 268Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Freeport v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. County of Kane v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Chief Judge of the Circuit Court v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31, AFL-CIOIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Board of Education of Plainfield Community Consolidated School District No. 202 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API