Legal Opinion

Gentry v. State, Dept. of Justice

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1997No. 96-345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

James Gentry appeals from the order of the Seventh Judicial District Court, Dawson County, denying his petition to challenge the suspension of his driving privileges for refusing to submit to a breathalyzer test under Montana’s implied consent law. We affirm.

We address the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in refusing to apply the “confusion doctrine?”

2. Did the District Court err in denying Gentry’s petition where the record discloses that a notary public was not present when the arresting officer signed the affidavit upon which the suspension was based?

BACKGROUND

James…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. BeckeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. State v. SeverinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rust v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Anderson v. State Dept. of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Williams v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hayes v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Patterson v. State, Dept. of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Patterson v. State, Dept. of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API