Frontier Autorama, Inc. v. Frontier City Amusements, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.
The appeal here is from what appellant characterizes as the second “judgment” handed down in this case — a judgment, it is contended, which the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter. We hold that no judgment at all has yet been rendered and affirm the denial of appellant’s request for a new trial.
I
This lawsuit began November 27, 1973 when an amusement park concession lessee, Frontier Autorama, Inc., sued the park owner, Frontier City Amusements, Inc., for relief under four causes of action. In the first three causes Autorama sought mainly to enjoin Frontier City…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Friend v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Porter v. TayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Tillman v. TillmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- LaVelle v. Fair Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Mann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983