Legal Opinion

Estate of Richet

Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

Decided April 6, 1909No. 1501Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

The clause of the will to be construed is as follows:

“Secondly—If any posthumous children should be born, I give and bequeath to them the sum of $5,000 each. To my. *335stepchildren, Thomas and Mathilda London, I give and bequeath $100 each.
“All the rest and residue of my estate, real or personal, wheresoever situate, of which I may die seized or possessed, I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved wife, Sarah Richet. . ... It is my wish that my wife pay a monthly pension of ten dollars to my beloved sister during the latter’s lifetime.”

The question to be determined in this matter is whether or…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Marti v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Clarke v. . LeuppNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Land v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Bliven v. . SeymourNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Phillips v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API