Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 1, 2015No. 13CR0975; A155096PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this criminal appeal, defendant challenges his concurrent sentences of 36 months’ imprisonment and 36 months’ post-prison supervision (PPS) as exceeding the maximum permitted by law. Defendant requests that we review his sentences as plain error under ORAP 5.45(1), and exercise our discretion to correct the error. See Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 382, 823 P2d 956 (1991).

Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree attempted assault. ORS 161.405(2)(c) (“An attempt is a * * * Class C felony if the offense attempted is a Class B felony.”); ORS 163.175(2) (“Assault…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. JennichesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. Chiew Tong SaechaoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Ortega-GonsalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. JepsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. StanifordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API