Legal Opinion
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hart's Estate
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 7, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
The facts in this case are the same as those involved in Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. Elizabeth K. Hart, decided at the present term of this Court. Elizabeth and the decedent, Tyler 6. Hart, who were husband and wife, entered into a joint obligation whereby they agreed to be sureties for the payment of sums owed by William H. and John G-. Keenan to the plaintiff. After default by the Keenans, Tyler died and Elizabeth became his administratrix. Suit was commenced against Elizabeth, and, in due time, a claim was presented to the commissioner of Tyler’s estate, which was disallowed and on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bank of North America v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
- Nill v. ComparetIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. E. Bean Construction Co. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Davidson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Rich v. HolmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Fletcher v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Weiner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.