Legal Opinion

Rich v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the negligent operation of the automobiles of the defendants. Trial was by jury. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff against both defendants, and judgment was rendered thereon. The defendant Holmes alone brings exceptions to this Court. The defendant’s -exceptions are to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict, and to the charge of the court, and they present a single question: Was the driver of the Holmes automobile acting as the agent and servant of defendant Holmes at the time of the accident, or was he at…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Kelley's Dependents v. Hoosac Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  3. Sparrow v. BromageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. Bradley v. BlandinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  5. In re CoteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allen v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  2. Fleece on Earth v. Dept. of Employment and TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. American Fidelity Co. v. KerrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Wigton v. LavenderOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ederer v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API