Legal Opinion

Holm v. Holm

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 24, 1995No. 93P-20974; CA A84395PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Wife petitions for an award of attorney fees against intervenor grandfather. We deny the petition.

Grandfather petitioned to intervene in wife’s and husband’s dissolution proceeding, seeking an order granting him grandparent visitation rights with regard to the couple’s child. The trial court allowed the petition to intervene. Later, it awarded grandfather visitation rights. Wife appealed, and we reversed. Holm and Holm, 132 Or App 440, 888 P2d 1077 (1995). Wife now petitions for an award of attorney fees incurred at trial and on appeal, citing ORS 107.105(l)(i) and ORS 107.105(5). Grandfather…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Eslamizar v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. In re the Marriage of HolmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HolmOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In re the Marriage ShofnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. In re the Marriage of CerdaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API