Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Johnke

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1931No. File No. 6966PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

Plaintiff was driving his automobile south from Lennox on the graveled highway on the evening of (September n, 1928, between 8:30 and 91 o’clock. He collided with defendants’ threshing outfit, which they were moving north. For his damages, he recovered verdict, and defendants appeal.

The refusal of the trial court to give two instructions requested -by defendant, based on the testimony of plaintiff, that his vision was temporarily impaired' by the glare of the headlights of an approaching car just prior to the accident, is assigned as error. The requested’ instructions were as follows:

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Aiken v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Adkisson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Corey v. KocerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Descombaz v. KlockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Maire v. Minidoka County Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API