Legal Opinion

Murphy v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1990No. 87-219PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant Murphy was charged by indictment with one count of distribution of hy-dromorphone (Dilaudid)1 and one count of possession of hydromorphone (Dilaudid) with intent to distribute it.2 A jury found him guilty of distribution as charged in the first count, and guilty of the lesser included offense of simple possession3 under the second count. Murphy contends on appeal that his convictions should be reversed because evidence of another drug sale was admitted at his trial during the government’s case in chief, contrary to the teaching of Drew v. United States, 118…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Jefferson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API