People v. Woods
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
These interlocutory appeals are prosecuted pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 and are consolidated because the facts and issues in both cases are the same. The appellants, referred to as defendants herein, contend that the trial court erred in denying their individual motions to suppress evidence which was seized from the car of the defendant Robert Miles. We find no error in the trial courts’ denial of the defendants’ motions to suppress, and accordingly, we affirm.
The defendants were both charged with the crimes of forgery (C.R.S. 1963, 40-6-1) and conspiracy to commit forgery (C.R.S. 1963, 40-7-35).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. DaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. NobleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. FearsColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- People v. PadillaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.