Legal Opinion

Perron v. Aranosian

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 9, 1986No. 85-160PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

We affirm the judgment for the defendant in this action to recover consideration paid and consequential damages, following the plaintiffs’ purported revocation of their acceptance of a used truck purchased from the defendant. See RSA 382-A:2-608.

The Concord District Court (Robbins, J.) found that on March 31, 1983, the plaintiffs bought a used 1979 Ford truck from the defendant for $4740, paying $240 in cash, trading in a 1973 GMC truck valued at $1000, and giving a $3500 note which the defendant *94assigned to GMAC. They accepted the truck without test-driving it, but thereafter brought it back…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Welch v. Fitzgerald-Hicks Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Morency v. PlourdeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
  3. Werner v. MontanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Fome Associates v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Nashua Housing Authority v. TassieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rix v. Kinderworks Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Kowalski v. Cedars of Portsmouth Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Dombrowski v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. 412 South Broadway Realty, LLC & a. v. John M. Wolters, Jr. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API