David W. Wilson v. Stuart Sherman, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID W. WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00874-JLT-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 13 v. DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE EXHAUSTION 14 STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 50) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Plaintiff David W. Wilson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims 21 against Defendants…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.