Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Coshnear
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 25, 1935PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These exceptions are prosecuted by the defendants Harry R. Coshnear and Samuel Coshnear. They will be referred to as the defendants. The third excepting defendant, one Mabey, waived his rights under the exceptions. The case against him need not be considered.
The defendants with others were charged in one indictment with having conspired together to commit the crime of defrauding persons, members of the general public, unknown to the defendants at the time of such conspiracy. Three days after a verdict of guilty was rendered against the defendants and Mabey, that indictment was placed on file…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Commonwealth v. ChanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GreenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Commonwealth v. MonahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. HartfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.