Bonner v. Meikle
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge (orally).
This suit was brought in the state court by complainant Bonner on behalf of himself and for the benefit of numerous other persons upon a protest made by complainants to an application made by defendants for a patent to the Raid Queen mining location at De Lamar, Lincoln county, Rev., and upon the petition of one of the defendants was removed to this court upon the ground of prejudice and local influence. Bonner v. Meikle, 77 Fed. 485. Some question was made in the oral argument of counsel as to the character of this suit. It was instituted under and by virtue…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Davis's Administrator v. WeibboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shoshone Min. Co. v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Grand Central Min. Co. v. Mammoth Min. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
- Golden v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Ambergris Mining Co. v. DayIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Fox v. MyersNevada Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.