Legal Opinion

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Gese

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 23, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

As to matters of procedure, this case is controlled by our recent decision in State Board v. Roche, 4 N. J. Adv. R. 417; 132 Atl. Rep. 86, holding that certiorari, and not appeal, is the only proper mode of review. The appeal will therefore be dismissed, with costs.

In view of the fact that the cited decision was very recently promulgated, we have thought it advisable, notwithstanding the faulty practice, to look into the merits, and discover no meritorious ground of appeal. The matter of trial without jury has already been settled by our decisions (State Board v. Buettal, 131 Atl. Rep. 89),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Board of Medical Examiners v. BuettelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  2. State Board of Medical Examiners v. RocheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Pharmacy v. AbramoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API