State Board of Medical Examiners v. Roche
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
Under the amendment of 1921 (Pamph. L., p. 702) to the act of 1894 (Pamph. L., p. 454; Comp. Stat., p. 3329), the appellant was prosecuted for the statutory penalty for practicing medicine without the required license, and was convicted in said District Court. She now appeals to this court, apparently, on the theory that the proceeding in question is governed by the provisions of the District Court act relating to appeals and judgments in that court.
On the merits, if they were properly before us, the judgment would have to be affirmed. The…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Board of Pharmacy v. AbramoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- State Board of Medical Examiners v. GeseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926