Legal Opinion

City of Milford v. Swarbrick

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 14, 1963No. File 99883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.

The interposed joint demurrer of the minor defendant, Charles Steele, and his parents, the defendants Clarence Steele and Eleanor Steele, to the fifth and sixth counts of the complaint, which concern them (the preceding counts concern other defendants), raises the basic question whether the one-year statutory limitation of action (§ 52-584) controls or the three-year statutory limitation of action (§ 52-577).

The fifth count of the complaint is directed against Charles Steele. It alleges in substance that on or about September 5, 1961, this defendant “did wilfully, wantonly and maliciously set…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. SkiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Rogers v. DoodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Antinozzi v. D. v. Frione & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Lutteman v. MartinConnecticut Superior Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Shinabarger v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
  3. Gretkowski v. CoppolaConnecticut Superior Court · 1966
  4. Repko v. SerianiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
  5. DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API