Legal Opinion
Allcock v. Cohen
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.
Motion to dismiss complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against defendant Abraham S. Cohen, as surviving partner of the firm of Cohen & Kobre, attorneys at law, and as a partner of the firm of A. S. & H. M. Cohen, attorneys at law, and as against Herbert M. Cohen, partner of the firm of A. S. & H. M. Cohen, attorneys at law. The complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendant attorneys represented the defendant United Loan Industrial Bank formerly known by other names; that the defendant attorneys for the said bank issued to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Campbell v. . CothranNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Bonynge v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Adams v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Judson v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen & BaggNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jewelry Realty Corp. v. Newport Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
- Allcock v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945