Legal Opinion

Umbanet, Inc. v. Epsilon Data Management, LLC

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided April 18, 2017No. CASE NO. 2:16-CV-682-JRGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*649MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant Epsilon Data Management, LLC’s (“Epsilon”) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 26), arguing that the asserted patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101, and Plaintiff Umbanet, Inc.’s (“Um-banet”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 38) seeking to foreclose and dispose of Epsilon’s § 101 defenses. Having considered the motions and for the reasons set forth below, Epsilon’s Motion is GRANTED as to U.S. Patent No. 7,444,-374 (“the ’374 Patent”) and both motions are DENIED…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API