Legal Opinion
Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 20, 1942PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
The defendant Galde ivas employed as a canvasser and salesman by the defendant DiPerna, a “distributor” of prosecutor’s manufactures, new and second-hand; and the point of controversy is whether Galde is eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under R. S. 1937, 43:21-1, e t seq.
Concededly DiPerna was not an “employer” within the definition incorporated in section 43:21-19 (h). The Board of Review ruled that he was “a contractor for or agent of” prosecutor, an “employing unit” subject to the act, and therefore prosecutor is to be deemed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Saunders v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Kohler v. BarnesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- State v. CannarozziNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Ford Motor Co. v. NJ Dept. of Labor & IndustryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.