Legal Opinion

Hoffkins v. Hart-D'Amato

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 15, 2019No. AC39910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEveleigh, J.

In this action for the collection of unpaid legal fees, the named defendant, Dianne Hart-D'Amato, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Kevin L. Hoffkins. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion when it (1) denied her motion for disqualification of the trial judge, and (2) precluded relevant evidence offered by the defendant. 1 We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant was a party to a marital…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burns v. Quinnipiac UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Doe v. Town of W. HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. State v. WarrenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Gagliano v. Advanced Specialty Care, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Houghtaling v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Morton v. SyriacConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API