Legal Opinion

James v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 16, 1959No. C.D. 2116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The merchandise, the subject of this suit, consists of a high-speed machine used for packaging 2-pound bags of sugar. The collector of customs levied and collected duty at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, which provides as follows:

Articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, * * *, wholly or in chief value of metal, and not specially provided for:

Other * * * _13%% ad val.

I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Wheeler v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896
  5. Beadleston v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fritz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. James v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. James v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API