Legal Opinion

James v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 31, 1960No. 64481; protest 317045-K (Savannah)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

This case was original!y decided by this court in John S. James, a/o The Consolidated Packaging Corporation v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 133, C.D. 2116, in favor of the defendant. Counsel for plaintiff thereafter filed a motion for a rehearing which was duly granted by the court.

The collector of customs assessed duty at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, on certain high-speed machines designed for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donnelley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Danovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fritz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API