Legal Opinion

Little v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 13, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2022-1511Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAKYA LITTLE, Plaintiff, v. No. 22-cv-1511 (DLF) PAMELA BONDI, Defendant.1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Makya Little brings this employment action against the United States Attorney General under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Before the Court is the government’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 28. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND2 A. Little’s Employment Roles and the All Hands Event Beginning in 2009, Little, an African American woman, was employed by the Federal…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API