Legal Opinion

Weems v. DesPortes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1933No. 22748PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. “The custom of any business or trade” which “is of such universal practice as to justify the conclusion that it became, by implication, a part of the contract” (Civil Code of 1910, § 1, par. 4) may be established as part of a written contract, where the custom is not in conflict or inconsistent with any of the provisions of the contract; and since the custom, by implication, becomes part of the contract and does not constitute a parol agreement or undertaking between the parties, it may be established as a part of the contract, notwithstanding a provision in the contract that all…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Branch, Sons & Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Farmers Ginnery & Manufacturing Co. v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Farmers Ginnery & Manufacturing Co. v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Rochelle Gin & Cotton Co. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wood v. FRANK GRAHAM COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. CovingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API