Legal Opinion

United States v. Jennifer Gutterman, as Administratrix C.T.A. Of the Estate of David M. Schindler, Deceased, David M. Schindler, Jr., Third-Party and v. Farrow, Cahill, Kaswell, Segura and Rader, a Legal Co-Partnership, Third-Party And

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 11, 1983No. 81-4520Published

1Opinion of the Court

701 F.2d 104

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,

v.

Jennifer GUTTERMAN, as Administratrix c.t.a. of the Estate

of David M. Schindler, deceased, et al., Defendants.

David M. SCHINDLER, Jr., Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

FARROW, CAHILL, KASWELL, SEGURA AND RADER, a legal

co-partnership, et al., Third-Party Defendants and

Appellants.

No. 81-4520.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1982.

Decided March 11, 1983.

H. Wayne Goodroe, Farrow, Schildhause & Wilson, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff.

Warren G. Reid, Oakland, Cal., for defendants.

Appeal from the United States…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API