Legal Opinion

Dee-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Heveafil Sdn. Bhd.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 23, 1997No. Civil Action 97-556-APublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this antitrust action, two American purchasers of extruded rubber thread sue various foreign manufacturers and distributors of the thread, alleging an international conspiracy to restrain trade in, and fix prices of, the thread in the United States. Defendants’ several motions to dismiss raise the following threshold issues:(1) whether there is personal jurisdiction over an Indonesian manufacturer-defendant that consummates its sales of thread in Indonesia;(2) whether venue is proper in the Eastern District of Virginia;(3) whether, pursuant to Estate…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Graduate Management Admission Council v. RajuDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Modesto City Schools v. Riso Kagaku Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2001
  5. Dee-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Heveafil Sdn. Bhd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API