Jernigan v. State

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The accused was convicted of driving a truck in excess of the speed limitation under the provisions of Title 36, Sec. 5, Code 1940.

During the progress of the trial no objections were interposed to the introduction of the evidence; neither did the defendant request any written charges.

As we have often declared, our review is confined to questions raised at nisi prius so far as concerns the proceedings in; the main trial. Eatman v. State, 30 Ala. App. 312, 5 So.2d 119; Vandiver v. State, 30 Ala.App. 106, 1 So.2d 314.

The trial judge overruled appellant’s motion for a new…