Vandiver v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
The indictment in this case is in proper form and substance. It contained two counts and charged this appellant, defendant below (1) that he did distill, make or manufacture, alcoholic, spirituous, or malt liquors, a part of which was alcohol, con-possession, a still, apparatus, appliance or trary to law. And (2) that he had in his a device, or substitute therefor, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted or prohibited liquors or beverages, contrary to law, against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.
Numerous witnesses were…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Butler v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
- Jernigan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952