Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Tuscaloosa

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1928No. 6 Div. 291PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Appellant was tried and convicted for a .violation of an ordinance of the city of Tuscaloosa; the specific charge being that he had whisky in his possession. On appeal to the circuit court, the cause was tried de novo upon a complaint filed by the attorney for said city. To the charge therein contained he pleaded specially autre fois convict — former jeopardy — for the possession of the same whisky therein charged, and also not guilty. From a judgment of conviction in the circuit court this appeal was taken. The city took issue upon said special plea, and it is insisted that the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Holland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Ward v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. James v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. People v. Von LattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. Von LattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Territory v. CorumHawaii Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API