Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1918No. Civ. No. 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff, who is the son of the defendants, brought this action for the purpose of recovering the sum of five thousand six hundred dollars, alleged to have been turned over by him in small amounts from time to time during the period of his minority and for a period of time thereafter to the defendants.

The complaint alleges that, ‘-‘in the year 1906, the plaintiff . . . and the defendants . . . entered into an agreement wherein it was agreed between them that the plaintiff should engage in various occupations and that the wages' and salary earned by him should be turned over to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Boyle v. Coast Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Noakes v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. France v. A. P. A. Transport Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. France v. APA Transport Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Slater v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API