Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1911No. 3387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Accusation of selling mortgaged property; from city court of Jefferson — Judge Stark. January 6, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

In order for a mortgagor’s sale of mortgaged property to be an offense, under section 720 of the Penal Code (1910), three essential facts must appear: (1) That the sale was made without the consent of the mortgagee; (2) that it was made with intent to defraud the mortgagee; and (3) that loss was thereby sustained by the holder ■ of the mortgage. Reece v. State, 5 Ga. App. 663 (63 S. E. 670), and cases there cited. The evidence in this ease is.not clear as to the first, essential stated; and it is shown that even if the sale of the property was made, it was made without any intent to defraud…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Denney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API