Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1913No. 4279PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Misdemeanor; from city court of Eastman—-Judge Neese. April 11, 1912.

1Per curiam

1. The brief of the evidence which is made a part of the record in this case contains some superfluous matter, such as objections of counsel, rulings on testimony, and colloquies between court and counsel. Where there is apparently a bona fide effort to brief .the evidence in compliance with the statute on that subject, this court will not refuse to consider it, unless it appears that the violation of the statute requiring a proper brief of the evidence is of a flagrant character; and sueh is not the case as to the brief of the evidence in this record.

2. On the trial of an accusation against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  4. Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API