Legal Opinion
In re the Question in Controversy between Urban Renewal Agency & Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 24, 1975No. 74-4158 CA 4512PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This case was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts under ORS eh 27. At the request of the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene, hereinafter known as ERA (Eugene Renewal Agency), and in accordance with the Urban Renewal *386plan adopted by the City in 1968, the City had vacated an alley in downtown Eugene. The alley contained underground conduit, poles, and cable of Pacific Northwest Bell (PNB). The question at issue is whether ERA or PNB should pay the costs of relocating PNB’s facilities to an adjoining street. ERA appeals from the trial court’s ruling that it must…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Joseph v. Joseph Water Works Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Qwest Corp. v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Aspgren v. City of Columbia CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Union Electric Co. v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.