Legal Opinion

Small v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 15, 1997No. 94-618 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

WIESE, Judge.

On July 8, 1996, this court issued an opinion in this military pay case deciding, among other matters, that the Secretary of the Air Force (i) had not violated the “majority” determination requirements of 10 U.S.C. §§ 616(c) and 617(a) in identifying officers eligible for promotion through a panel selection system rather than through a unified selection board, and (ii) had sufficient procedural safeguards in place to assure a uniform distribution in the quality of officer records among the selection panel. Small v. United States, 36…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Small v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walter D. Small v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Hoskins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. Christian v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Fluellen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Neptune v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API