Legal Opinion

State v. Nab

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1987No. 16148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Randy Nab was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance by the second jury impanelled to hear the case. The first trial ended when the judge declared a mistrial after a juror failed to appear on the second day of trial. Nab has appealed, presenting four issues: (1) whether he was exposed to double jeopardy in violation of article 1, § 13, of the Idaho Constitution and the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution; (2) whether, at his second trial, he was denied a fair trial when he was not allowed to use prior felonies and witness bias for impeachment; (3)…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SantanaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. ManleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. MalandIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Joseph Woods v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API