Legal Opinion

State v. Manley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2005No. 31458PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

Appellant Joseph Allen Manley has requested review. of the district court’s sua sponte declaration of a mistrial based on manifest necessity. After the mistrial was declared, Manley’s motion to dismiss with prejudice on the grounds that any subsequent trial would be barred by double jeopardy was denied. Subsequently, the Respondent State of Idaho asked for a dismissal because new lab results had weakened the State’s case against Manley. The district court granted the State’s motion and dismissed the case without prejudice. The Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tracy Tucker v. State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. BarclayIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. HuntsmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. PHH Mortgage v. NickersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Dennis J. Sallaz and Marcy Fox v. Eugene (Roy) RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API