Schurra v. Buffalo-Pitts Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Poindexter, J., entered August 25, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover an agent’s commissions.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
This action is brought to recover commissions alleged to be due respondent on sales made by the respondent while acting as the agent of the appellant. Three causes of action are set forth in the complaint, all based on a contract of agency. The contract has, at its top, the following words: “For Season of 1901.” The first obligation of the appellant in the contract is as follows:
“1st. To furnish to the said party of the second part such number of engines, threshers, swinging stackers, horse-powers, and their appurtenances (manufactured by it, the Buffalo Pitts Company), as the said party of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tatterson v. Suffolk Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Sines v. Superintendents of the PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Tallon v. Grand Portage Copper Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Babcock v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelley-Clarke Co. v. Northwestern Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921